Over at the Spearhead, the always wise and thought-provoking Zed has shared
two posts on the "art of loving" that were both interesting in themselves but also in the conversation that was sparked as a result. "The Art of Loving" was a book that found its way onto my bookshelf, along with several others, after coming across Zed's now-defunct website two years ago.
The first post mainly sparked thoughts about romantic love and sex, which I thought was rather strange as this is not the only type of love that exists but is not the only type of love that should be expressed between two partners. Eros is a wonderful sentiment, but eros isn't what makes you takes care of a sick person, It doesn't make you change somebody's bandages. Eros doesn't compel you to stand by your partner and fight for them when they need somebody to have their back when nobody else does. Philia and agape love do!
These two loves also inspire a person to give their just purchased lunch to a homeless man, to look into his eyes and recognize his humanity when it might be more comfortable to ignore him and deny him this act of kindness, as you can remain in your bubble and not face the ugly side of life. They are the driving force that compels people to stop and help out after a car accident, to invite a neighbor child to go with your family to the pumpkin patch, to volunteer to care for your nephew while his single sailor mother is out to sea. Philia and agape make a person look past themselves and bear the burden of another, when it likely places a burden on themselves. We called this "one anothering" during my fundie days and I still believe this is not merely important part of life but a large part of our purpose in this lifetime, as we mature and learn to overcome our selfish nature, a desire for comfort, and give a care about our fellow man.
So often eros is held up as *the* only, or at least most important, love in Western culture, and as Zed brings up,
this is why people are empty and depressed today. We treat each other as objects, hoarding our love and giving only to those who are "worthy", rather then giving freely to those who need it, which is probably everybody in our mean cruel world. We humans are not only imperfect creatures, but fragile ones as well. We hurt, feel pain, cry, get offended, and hurt each other intentionally and not. Our bodies fail us with illnesses, heart attacks, cancer, and so much more. We're delicate creatures who need love and care from ourselves and from each other. Not cruel ideals of perfection that can never be obtained. Sometimes I like to think if we collectively gave up on attaining perfection and instead focused on the art of loving that many hearts wouldn't be broken in this world, many spirits wouldn't be crushed, but that's simply not realistic as it defies human nature.
I do think, however, on an individual level doing this is enriching not only to yourself but to others as well. To look at people not as commodity, objects, or works-in-progress to clean up and fix but people worthy of love who are all the more endearing because of their messy imperfection and idiosyncrasies. These oddities are what make us unique individuals after all. I also think it's essential to stop looking at what people can give us, but what we can give them. This is largely why I find chivalry so abhorrent in the form that existed in the fundie world I was once part, for it encouraged me as a woman to look at what others can do for me rather than what I can do for them. Why should I worry about a man giving me, an able bodied young woman, his seat on the bus when I can stand up for a man old enough to be y father who might be beginning to feel the aches and pain of his older age? To give is to love, to take take take is selfishness.
This holds true in marriage as well. So many people want to hold people to harsh stereotypes and paradigms of an era gone by or ones from biology alone, as if we were unable to overcome anything and must live in a scripted life. One one of the threads in question a woman named kis claimed that the only thing men can give women is resources, which is a notion to which I strongly object.
My comment from The Spearhead~
kis- So what’s left? A diamond necklace, or a nice car, or new furniture, or designer clothes!
Many things if a partnership isn’t solely defined by sex, take take take, and resource flow.
Firstly though a woman needs to realize Valentines Day is a rather idiotic & misandrist holiday and a diamond war is forever. (Really…google some info on conflict diamonds and tell me if you really want the blood of a poor African on you for some sparkly shine. Sick!) These things aren’t special and aren’t something that is worth tears over not receiving or a man giving three months salary for. Until a woman acknowledges the fact happiness is not bought, nor does love come in gift wrap she can never find happiness nor can she have give or receive any sort of love.
Part of the beauty of being human, as opposed to an animal, ought to be overcoming biology the best we can and aspiring towards something greater, including self-sacrificing love not only for romantic partners, children, and other family members but for our fellow man ins general as well. The world is a mean cruel place but doing a little bit to brighten the darkness is rewarding for yourself and others. Far more than a consumerist holiday or piece of jewelry could ever be.
So what’s left? Many things are. Someone with whom to share mutual companionship in life and loving cooperation to find happiness and success in whatever way one defines such terms. Someone to invest in and give everything you have to help them out and allow them to accomplish their goals and plans. A person who is interesting, funny, a joy to be around, and always a bit of a mystery to unravel. A partner-in-crime for zany plans, explorations, and adventure. A fellow traveler through the seasons of life who knows and shares your history and pens their life story alongside you. An iron to sharpen iron and challenge each other to better, not be lazy, and realize that no might often be the worst case scenario when one takes chances to go after their dreams. A father alongside your mother if there are children. The yang to your yin. And on and on.
Love is something more than the material. Something more than sex and biology. Something deeper than loving because you
have to. Or so it should be, if one wants to lead a rich life that blesses others and has deeper meaning than the lies we're being sold.